The Federal Trade Commission’s Sept. 12 warning to healthcare employers is a simple message with real operational consequences. Overbroad noncompetes, no‑poach language, and “de facto” restraints chill worker mobility and can limit patients’ ability to choose their clinicians. For practices building Advanced Primary Care Management teams, restrictive templates do more than create legal risk. They slow hiring, increase churn, and ultimately suppress panel growth. The good news is that programs designed around fair mobility, documented supervision, and clean data protections tend to recruit better and scale faster.
‍

What the FTC letter actually signals

No nationwide ban exists today, but the enforcement environment has changed. The Commission’s outreach to provider organizations and staffing firms communicates that case‑by‑case scrutiny is on the table. The lens is broader than classic noncompetes. Agencies are looking at no‑poach agreements, information sharing about wages, training repayment devices that act like lock‑ins, and liquidated damages that operate as penalties. In short, healthcare employers should assume contracts will be read through a worker‑mobility and patient‑choice lens.
‍

Why restrictive contracts backfire on recruitment

Markets with heavy “noncompete” usage have thinner applicant pools. Clinicians avoid communities where lateral moves come with downtime or relocation. Younger physicians and experienced care managers are especially sensitive to these constraints. The practical effect inside a practice is familiar: longer time‑to‑hire, higher reliance on locums or agency, and rising total cost per filled role. Even when a noncompete is enforceable under state law, it can still be a recruiting deterrent that competitors exploit by advertising mobility‑friendly policies. When the labor market notices, you are paying a premium to defend a clause that no longer serves you.

The indirect costs are just as real. Overbroad restrictions shift energy away from culture, supervision, and process. Teams spend more time debating contract language and less time tuning panel workflows, outreach cadence, and post‑discharge touchpoints. The signal to candidates is unmistakable.
‍

Patient choice and APCM access

APCM is built on longitudinal relationships. If a care‑team member exits and patients must switch clinicians or wait out a restriction, continuity suffers. In rural counties and tight urban submarkets, a single departure can shrink appointment supply for months. Noncompetes that bite across a broad radius or include categorical bans on patient contact can interrupt chronic care plans and frustrate beneficiaries who reasonably expect to follow their focal clinician. When contracts prioritize territorial control over access, they undermine the very metrics practices are trying to improve.
‍

What fair looks like inside APCM care‑manager teams

Teams that scale APCM effectively tend to make a handful of design choices that hold up under regulatory and market scrutiny:

• Mobility‑neutral staffing. Roles are defined against APCM service elements, not against personalities. Documentation is standardized so coverage survives turnover without punishing anyone for changing jobs.
• Tight confidentiality and IP, not broad bans. Contracts protect patient lists, data models, and workflow IP through confidentiality, access controls, and assignment clauses. Restrictions on patient solicitation, where permitted, are narrow and time‑limited with clear continuity‑of‑care carve‑outs.
• Compensated stability. Notice periods are reasonable and tied to cross‑training and handoffs. Retention value comes from culture and benefits, not from penalties dressed up as training repayment.
• Supervision discipline. General‑supervision standards are explicit. Consent language, care plans, transitions of care, and after‑hours access are documented in a way that survives staff changes and audits.

When these elements are built into the operating model, recruitment materials become simpler, offer letters move faster, and patient choice is preserved without leaning on heavy post‑employment restraints.
‍

Partnering with vendor platforms without no‑poach risk

Platform partnerships are essential in APCM for analytics, outreach, and clinical operations. They are also where many of the riskiest clauses hide. Platform agreements that work in the current environment share a set of characteristics:

• Compete on value, not hiring restrictions. Avoid mutual no‑poach language. Where stability matters, use a transparent right‑to‑hire construct for vendor‑assigned staff with a limited, capped placement fee. It clarifies incentives without suppressing mobility.
• Clean information flows. Keep compensation data out of joint forums. Rely on independent benchmarking and role‑based ranges instead of exchanging live wage or bonus data with a partner who also hires from the same market.
• Data and IP clarity. Spell out ownership of registries, algorithms, and workflow artifacts. Protect them through access and use terms rather than by limiting lawful employment choices of individual clinicians.
• APCM alignment in the MSA. Bake supervision, consent capture, transitions of care, and 24/7 access expectations into the contract. Make staffing credentials and service levels explicit so quality is not dependent on who a vendor assigns next quarter.

These choices support compliance and remove a major source of friction in provider‑vendor relationships. They also make it easier to onboard the next market without rewriting the playbook.
‍

Build vs buy, and why the operating model is the real differentiator

There are two reliable ways to get this right. One is to learn all of it the hard way over multiple cycles of hiring, attrition, and contract cleanup while state law shifts under your feet. The other is to adopt an operating model that already embeds mobility‑friendly contracting, supervision discipline, and platform guardrails as defaults.

In our experience, leaders do not need another to‑do list. They need a system that assumes fairness and compliance and proves it every day in how the team hires, schedules, documents, and reports. That is why we engineered our APCM operating stack to make the compliant choice the easy choice. Templates reflect current state‑level constraints. Supervision checklists are native to onboarding. Vendor agreements align to patient choice and audit reality. Panel growth and access targets stay front and center because the contracts are not fighting the strategy.

When this is the baseline, your team talks more about patient outcomes and less about whether a clause will survive an enforcement letter. Recruiters lead with culture and mission. Candidates hear mobility and growth, not restrictions and penalties. Patients keep their clinicians.
‍

Guardrails that still matter

• Mind the patchwork. State noncompete rules, wage thresholds, and healthcare‑specific carve‑outs vary widely and continue to evolve. Treat templates as living documents.
• Watch for de facto restraints. Training repayment agreements, exit fees, and long non‑solicits can chill mobility if drafted broadly. Keep any cost recovery tied to actual, documented expenses and use pro‑rata reductions.
• Document legitimate interests. Where a narrow restraint remains, record the specific trade secret or investment it protects and why alternatives would not suffice. That paper trail is a practical defense if the clause is questioned.
• Separate patient rights from employment debates. Continuity‑of‑care expectations should be explicit and honored regardless of who employs a clinician next quarter.
  ‍

The bottom line

The FTC’s message is not anti‑growth. It is a reminder that healthcare organizations can protect what matters without suppressing mobility or patient choice. Practices that embed fair contracts, supervision discipline, and data clarity into their APCM model hire faster, retain longer, and serve patients better. That is the operating posture we build and run every day.

If you want to see what a mobility‑friendly APCM operating model looks like in practice, request a 20 minute readiness review. Or DM me for the checklist we use with practice leaders and platform partners.

Disclaimer: This article is informational only and not legal advice; APCM coverage and contracting requirements vary by MAC and plan.

‍

‍

Advanced Primary Care Management represents Medicare's most ambitious attempt to transform primary care economics. Unlike previous programs that nibbled at the margins, APCM fundamentally restructures how practices organize, deliver, and bill for comprehensive care.

The opportunity is real: practices executing APCM effectively report 20-30% revenue increases, 40% reduction in acute care events, and dramatic improvements in provider satisfaction. The risks are equally real: a $14.9 million settlement for improper chronic care billing reminds us that good intentions don't replace rigorous execution.

Having analyzed CMS evaluations, vendor data, and early adopter experiences, here is the operational blueprint that separates APCM success from expensive failure.

Start With Compliance Architecture

Before enrolling your first patient, build compliance into your operational DNA. This is about creating sustainable systems that protect your practice while delivering superior care.

Your compliance framework requires:

Documentation Protocols: Every patient interaction must be captured within 48 hours. Create templates for consent discussions, care plan updates, and monthly touchpoints. Build automated flags for missing documentation before billing submission.

Supervision Standards: General supervision means the billing practitioner is immediately available by phone during all APCM services. Document your supervision structure, including coverage arrangements and escalation protocols.

Billing Integrity: Only one practitioner can bill APCM per patient monthly. APCM cannot be billed concurrently with CCM, PCM, or TCM. Build system edits that prevent concurrent billing automatically.

Audit Readiness: Maintain detailed logs of all patient interactions, including unsuccessful contact attempts. Create monthly compliance reports that verify every billed service meets CMS requirements.

Solve the Staffing Equation Through Technology

APCM's staffing expectations (1,000 to 2,500 patients per care manager) require fundamental workflow redesign. The math is simple: at 2,000 patients requiring monthly touchpoints, a care manager has 5.4 minutes per patient monthly assuming zero documentation time.

The successful staffing model:

Tier Your Population: Use HCC scores, social determinants, and utilization history to stratify patients into engagement levels. High-risk patients receive weekly touchpoints; stable patients receive efficient monthly check-ins.

Deploy Intelligent Automation: AI-enabled documentation reduces charting time by 70%. Automated outreach campaigns handle routine check-ins. Predictive analytics flag patients requiring immediate intervention.

Create Specialized Roles: Separate enrollment specialists, care coordinators, and clinical reviewers. Each role requires 40+ hours of initial training plus monthly skill reinforcement.

Build Surge Capacity: Partnering with third-party care management services for overflow support has been the answer but practices immediately give away a sizable percentage of reimbursements when they rely on a vendor. Maintaining staffing flexibility for enrollment campaigns and quality reporting periods for the early periods of the program is the best system.

Master the Revenue Model

APCM's financial model rewards scale and operational excellence while punishing inefficiency. Your pro forma must reflect reality, not optimism.

Revenue planning essentials:

Realistic Enrollment: Model 35% enrollment at G0557 level ($83 average), not the 60-70% vendors promise. Factor 15-20% cost-sharing refusal from seniors on fixed incomes.

Transition Costs: Expect 60-90 day revenue delays during initial implementation. Medicare Advantage plans may take 6-12 months to recognize APCM codes.

Performance Variables: Quarterly adjustments based on quality metrics can swing revenue by 15%. Build conservative assumptions about performance scores during your first year.

Break-Even Analysis: You need 35% enrollment at G0557 rates to cover care management infrastructure. ROI realistically occurs at 18-24 months, not 6-12 months.

Opportunity Cost: Calculate lost revenue from forfeiting TCM, virtual check-ins, and other billable services for APCM patients.

Execute Patient Engagement Strategically

Patient consent and engagement determine program viability. CPC+ practices that treated enrollment as an administrative task achieved 20% participation. Those that built engagement strategies achieved 45%.

Your engagement blueprint:

Benefits-First Conversations: Train staff to explain APCM as "your personal healthcare advocate who knows your medical history and helps coordinate all your care." Address costs only after establishing value.

Financial Sensitivity: Identify financial assistance programs proactively. Create hardship protocols for patients who cannot afford cost-sharing.

Communication Preferences: Document whether patients prefer calls, texts, or portal messages. Honor these preferences to maximize engagement.

Family Integration: Develop protocols for involving caregivers with proper HIPAA authorization. Complex patients often require family support for care plan adherence.

Monthly Touchpoint Strategy: Design interactions that provide value, not just meet billing requirements. Medication reviews, preventive care reminders, and care coordination updates maintain engagement.

Build Integrated Technology Infrastructure

Technology integration determines whether APCM enhances or overwhelms your practice. Partial integration guarantees failure.

Essential integration points:

Patient Identification and Eligibility: You must have a system to automatically flag APCM-eligible patients based on diagnosis codes, utilization patterns, and payer source.

Care Plan Management: Bi-directional data flow between care management platforms and EHRs ensures documentation completeness and accuracy.

Remote Monitoring: To capture add-on care effectively, device data must flow seamlessly into care plans, triggering alerts for clinical deterioration.

Billing Validation: Automated checks verify documentation completeness, consent status, and concurrent billing restrictions before claim submission.

Performance Tracking: Real-time dashboards monitor enrollment rates, engagement metrics, and quality indicators.

Manage Performance Proactively

Performance-based payment adjustments can devastate practice economics if you're reactive. Successful practices treat performance management as a daily discipline.

Critical performance indicators:

Utilization Metrics: Track hospital admissions and ED visits by risk tier daily. Investigate every acute event to identify prevention opportunities.

Engagement Scores: Monitor patient contact rates, care plan completion, and satisfaction scores weekly.

Quality Measures: Align APCM activities with MIPS and ACO quality metrics for maximum reimbursement.

Financial Performance: Review revenue per patient, cost per patient, and margin trends monthly.

Predictive Analytics: Use risk scores to identify patients likely to experience acute events within 30 days. Intervene proactively.

Navigate the Small Practice Challenge

Independent practices face structural disadvantages but are not excluded from APCM success. The key is leveraging shared resources while maintaining clinical autonomy.

Small practice strategies:

Collaborative Networks: Join IPAs or ACOs, or find reasonable cost technology partners that provide technology infrastructure and operational support.

Vendor Partnerships: Avoid vendors for care coordination whenever possible to maximize on patient care results and reimbursements.

Focused Implementation: Start with your highest-risk (QMB Level 3+) patients where APCM's care coordination provides maximum value.

Advocacy Engagement: Participate in medical associations advocating for small practice support in value-based programs.

The Path Forward

APCM is a fundamental shift in primary care delivery and economics. Practices that approach it as a billing opportunity will fail. Those that use it to redesign care delivery will thrive.

The lessons from CPC+ and Primary Care First are clear: success requires operational excellence, not just good intentions. The practices building sustainable APCM programs invest in compliance infrastructure, deploy technology strategically, and maintain relentless focus on both patient outcomes and financial performance.

Medicare's move toward value-based care is irreversible. APCM represents your opportunity to lead this transformation rather than be displaced by it. The question isn't whether to participate—it's whether you're prepared to execute at the level required for success.

‍

Advanced Primary Care Management (APCM) is Medicare’s newest program, introduced in 2025 with three billing codes: G0556, G0557, and G0558. This represents a pivotal shift toward value-based primary care by offering monthly reimbursements for delivering continuous, patient-focused services. You're already providing these services—why not get paid for it?

So, what do you need if you're going to implement APCM?
‍

1. 24/7 Clinician Access

Patients enrolled in APCM must have the ability to reach a clinician at any time, day or night. In practice, this typically involves setting up an on-call rotation among your staff or contracting with a dedicated nurse triage service. Whoever answers the call should have secure, real-time access to patient charts, ensuring accurate decision-making and compliance with documentation requirements.
‍

2. Consistent Care Provider

Continuity is key in APCM—patients should consistently see the same provider or care team member. You’ll need to assign each patient a designated clinician or care team, adjusting your scheduling and routing processes so follow-up visits and communications are consistent and personalized.
‍

3. Flexible Care Delivery

Care delivery under APCM extends beyond traditional office visits. Your practice will need to offer telehealth visits (both video and phone), portal-based e-visits, and even accommodate extended hours or home visits when appropriate. These options help ensure patient needs are met conveniently and effectively.
‍

4. Comprehensive Care Management

APCM requires a broader view of care management, addressing not only medical needs but also psychosocial and functional health concerns. Your practice should implement structured intake procedures, regular medication reconciliations, preventive health checks, and proactive monitoring of high-risk patients.
‍

5. Electronic, Patient-Centered Care Plan

Every patient enrolled in APCM must have a dynamic, electronic care plan accessible to the patient, their caregivers, and the clinical team. This plan should be regularly updated, especially after significant health changes like new diagnoses, medications adjustments, or hospitalizations.
‍

6. Timely Follow-Up After Care Transitions

Patients discharged from hospitals, emergency rooms, or skilled nursing facilities must receive follow-up contact within seven days. Implementing processes to capture admission and discharge notifications and assigning staff to promptly follow up are critical for compliance and continuity.
‍

7. Coordinated Practitioner and Community Support

Primary care under APCM involves close coordination with specialists, home health services, and local community resources. Your practice should maintain a reliable referral tracking system, securely store consult notes, and build and regularly update a directory of community-based support services.
‍

8. Enhanced Patient Communication

Patients should be able to communicate with their care team asynchronously via secure messaging or patient portals. Establishing protocols to ensure staff respond promptly—typically within one to two business days—helps maintain patient engagement and satisfaction.
‍

9. Documented Patient Consent

Before enrolling a patient in APCM, informed consent must be clearly documented. Patients need to understand billing exclusivity, their right to discontinue services, and potential cost-sharing responsibilities. Creating and using standardized scripts and consent forms will simplify this process and ensure compliance.
‍

10. Required Initiating Visit

New patients or those who haven't been seen in over three years require an initiating visit to begin APCM services, often conducted as an Annual Wellness Visit or comprehensive evaluation. During this visit, your team should review health conditions, set initial care goals, and capture consent documentation thoroughly.
‍

11. Population-Level Data Analysis

Practices implementing APCM must proactively analyze their patient panels to identify and address gaps in care. Utilizing population health dashboards can help your team efficiently identify patients needing screenings, lab tests, or follow-up visits and assign outreach tasks accordingly.
‍

12. Risk-Based Patient Stratification

CMS expects practices to categorize patients into low, medium, and high-risk groups. This stratification should be based on factors such as chronic conditions, recent hospitalizations, emergency visits, and social determinants of health. High-risk patients, in particular, will require more frequent contact and intensive management.
‍

13. Quality Performance Measurement

Practices are required to regularly measure and report on specific quality metrics, such as blood pressure and A1c control, through MIPS Value Pathways or an ACO. Ensuring your electronic health record system can capture these metrics and produce accurate, audit-ready reports is crucial for meeting reporting obligations.
‍

How FairPath Can Help

FairPath simplifies implementing APCM by embedding these requirements into your daily workflow. From managing care plans, facilitating seamless patient communications, and ensuring compliance with quality reporting, FairPath provides the tools necessary for successful APCM implementation. We’re excited to support practices transitioning to this new care model, making high-quality, proactive patient care achievable and financially sustainable.

‍